Would You Pay $5000 for an MVP Development Service? Seeking Feedback on My Idea
Hi everyone,
I’m working on a service called 5kmvp, where we help entrepreneurs and businesses get their ideas turned into functional MVPs (Minimum Viable Products) for just $5000. Before I dive deeper into building the platform, I wanted to get some feedback on whether this idea would actually work.
The Process:
Here’s how it would work:
Customers visit our website and pay $5000.
Within 2 days, we’ll create a roadmap for the product based on online meetings to understand what they want.
We’ll build the product, test it, deploy it to their servers with in 2 weeks, and make sure it’s up and running.
After delivery, we’ll offer a 1-month bug-fix period where we’ll fix any issues that come up.
The Question:
I’m curious to know if people would be willing to pay $5000 for an MVP development service.
Would you trust an online software agency with this kind of money?
Is $5000 a reasonable price for an MVP? If you don't why and what can we do about that?
Background:
We’re a software consultancy that has worked with companies like Bosch, Buderus, Mercedes, Deutsche Bank and etc.. providing expert software solutions. Our team has a lot of experience in developing high-quality products quickly, and now we want to apply this experience to help potential clients launch their MVPs.
I’m really trying to validate this idea before moving forward, so any feedback would be appreciated!
Thanks in advance!
Replies
Being a CERT-In Empanelled Auditor is essential for organizations to ensure compliance with cybersecurity standards and protect critical digital assets. Penetolabs provides expert auditing services to help businesses meet regulatory requirements and enhance their security posture. Their team follows stringent assessment methodologies to identify vulnerabilities and recommend effective security measures. With cyber threats on the rise, partnering with a trusted CERT-In empanelled auditor like Penetolabs ensures robust protection against potential cyber risks while maintaining compliance with Indian cybersecurity regulations.
I think your idea has a lot of potential, but there are a few things that might make people hesitate. A fixed price of $5000 for an MVP is attractive, especially for non-technical founders who just want to get their idea off the ground without worrying about managing developers or scope creep. The speed is also a big selling point—getting something functional in two weeks is a strong value proposition.
That said, trust is going to be your biggest hurdle. If I were a startup founder, handing over $5000 to an online MVP Development Services https://tech-stack.com/services/poc-mvp-development provider without a track record in this specific space would feel risky. The fact that your team has worked with big companies like Bosch and Mercedes adds credibility, but those aren’t necessarily the same as fast-moving startup MVPs. There’s a difference between building polished enterprise software and hacking together something scrappy that a startup can test with early users.
Another concern is scope. Some ideas fit into a two-week build, but plenty don’t. If I were paying you, I’d want to know exactly what I’m getting, what’s realistic in that timeframe, and how much flexibility I have if my idea turns out to need something more than just a basic prototype. If you can address those concerns—maybe by showing real examples, offering a phased payment structure, or even guaranteeing a refund if the roadmap meeting reveals that the idea is too complex—then I think people would be a lot more willing to take the plunge.
Would I personally pay for it? If I had a straightforward idea and saw strong proof that you can deliver at this price and speed, I’d be tempted. But if I were looking for something beyond a bare-bones MVP, I’d probably be more cautious.