AI Writing can generate content quickly and efficiently, maintain a consistent tone, style, and voice, and analyze data and trends to generate content tailored to specific audiences. On the other hand, Human Writing can bring a unique creative touch to content, and infuse content with emotions, personal experiences, and empathy.
If the goal is to produce large amounts of standardized content quickly, AI might be preferable. If the goal is to create thought-provoking, emotionally resonant, or deeply informative content, human writing could be better.
Agree with most comments here. However, I recommend using both - AI can give you best practice results but creativity can come through your prompts and edits. I have been doing the same for some time now.
AI can write great content for you , that's why i have created TextCraft AI. People waste lots of precious time wasting on email inbox, i want to save your time , feel free to follow. Happy to answer if you have any questions.. - producthunt.com/products/textcraft-ai
As a UX writer, I have to vote for human-generated content. AI is great at creating a lot of content fast, but whether that content is accurate or factual, as well as relevant and timely to users are separate issues. It’s great for setting up shop, but I still see plenty of value in folks in SEO, UX, etc., to fine tune it or take it to the next level. That’s been my work alongside design teams that use AI opposed to involving a content person earlier in the process; humanizing writing. 😄
Depends on the use case. AI writing, like GPT-3, can churn out content quickly but might lack nuance. Human writing still has the edge in creativity and context understanding. For efficiency, AI; for depth, human.
Human, that's for sure. Let me explain. I've worked with AI as both a data scientist and a user, and the AI-generated text is highly noticeable. Yes, it creates content quickly, and it's not so bad, but, really, I keep seeing the same posts on LinkedIn or anywhere else that have absolutely identical structures.
The combination of artificial and human writing is the best shot.
It seems to me that programs can make mistakes and it’s better when a person works on writing the text. Of course, editing takes a lot of time. So I read paper24 review and decided to use the services of writers. My coursework was completed according to the teacher's requirements. And I didn’t worry that there would be typos and mistakes in the text.
Replies
Open dataset library
Open dataset library
SocialSignal AI
Content Oyster
Savvy Planner