p/job-taken
Find out how susceptible is your job to computerization
Ben Tossell
Will Robots Take My Job? β€” Find out how susceptible is your job to computerization
Featured
70
β€’

Based on a 2013 report by Carl Benedikt Frey and Michael A. Osborne of Oxford University. Will Robots Take My Job shows you the probability that your job will taken by an AI or a Robot.

Replies
Jenny Shen
There's no UX or interaction designers, so I guess robots aren't taken my job 😏
Conway Anderson
They can't steal your job if you don't have one
Adam
looks awesome! @mubashariqbal how long did it take to ship from the day you started coding it? thnx
Mubashar Iqbal
@adamhodara My first commit to the codebase was: Sat May 13 10:55:13 2017 -0400
Kevando
Did Jeff Sessions come up with these stats??
Sourav Ray
This perhaps the safest job in the world
Cara Parrish
@souravray Only in the way that "safest" means robots don't take it. The irony being in terms of physical safety it's not highly ranked at all.
Bharath B Lohray
@souravray @dreamture I tried searching for "prostitute" it is missing in the DB. I can think of these creepy being from the AI Movie, what is the probability of that coming to pass?
Mubashar Iqbal
Thanks for the hunt @bentossell ! Just a few weeks ago, I joined the freelance.tv (thx @dannpetty) community slack where @dreamture reached out to see if I might be interested on working on a side project. I've been involved in the bot scene for a while (πŸ‘‹ https://www.producthunt.com/post...), so Dimitar's idea to build a website to show how susceptible your job is to automation peeked my interest. He had found the data in an report published in 2013, and we pulled in some additional data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and we had the basis of our website. Dimitar did a great job of designing a clean but interesting interface, and I got to coding. We pulled the data into Algolia to make it easy to find the jobs. I found the numbers interesting, and seeing how far things have come since 2013, I'm curious to see how automation will continue to move into the work place. Hope you like it!
Ryan Troll
@mubashariqbal @bentossell @dannpetty @dreamture nice use of ONET data guys! We used onet data at my last startup to build a KSA map of all the jobs in the US. I like your use of the data set! Are you catching the data locally and using your own services or are you using ONETs API? Did you consider including the related job titles in the API call? The occupational titles seem too broad, if you add related job titles that brings your jobs up to around 85k different possible "street names" for jobs.
Allan Zhang
I searched for "Fashion Model" and got 98%. Wait what? πŸ’
Cara Parrish
@daspianist I mean why can't we use robots to model clothes? The robots could move to reflect body measurements or this could simply be about those apps that scan you and then recommend clothing for your body.
Allan Zhang
@carafnparrish I see your point. In the technical context of the word "model", I think a robot-model definitely makes sense. However, in the marketing campaign, Vogue spread context of "model" (which I believe is what "fashion model" was referencing), my personal opinion is that humans are still hard to replace - even down the road.
Cara Parrish
@daspianist I mean with enough aesthetic work will we even be able to tell the difference in a human model and what will basically be a "Real Doll" but in a fashion model version instead of a love doll version in a Vogue spread?
Brian Lee
Software developers, software engineers, and programmers are essentially the same profession yet the results are drastically different. What's your methodology for determining the numbers?
Dimitar Raykov
@kay0stheory The data was collected from a report titled "The Future of Employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?”, published by Carl Benedikt Frey and Michael A. Osborne: http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk... We also aggregated additional data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, related to the number of jobs and salary.
Tony Brix
tldr; Yes.
Matt Danna
Haha. I'm intrigued that there's an 11% chance for hair stylists yet 80% for barbers. I think we're pretty far off from robot haircuts...
Farbod Saraf
There's a 48% chance "Programmers" will be replaced by robots. If we get to that point I guess there won't be any other jobs on earth.
Nicolas Le Roux
I really love the design, great job here and the data is interesting!
Dimitar Raykov
@nico_lrx Thank you! Really appreciate it. :)
Dre DurrπŸ’‘
I love it when I put in "Legal Secretary" it said... "YOUR DOOMED" lol Love the interface. DOpe🚬🚬
Mubashar Iqbal
@dredurr Thanks! We had fun working on it.
Troy Rizzo
Great site! Me and my wife's jobs are at 8.4% I'm hoping that's not too high πŸ™
Dimitar Raykov
@troyrizzo Haha. This doesn't seem high for me! 😬 My job is also safe - 8.2% probability of automation https://willrobotstakemyjob.com/...
Andrey Azimov
Nice idea! P.S. Why I can't check if robots will take prostitute job? :D
Narek Vardanyan
funny :)
Andrew Richard
Computer Programmers rates 45% this is crazy.
Chintamani Chintadripettai
could you add a top 10 list somewhere for those of us who are too lazy to check multiple professions - say, a top 10 most prone to automation; or top 10 highest/lowest paying vs. propensity for automation; given you are using algolia, this kind of faceted view will be trivial for you to setup on the backend.
Pietz Prove
Computer Programmer: 48% Application Software Developer: 4.2% oO?
Mubashar Iqbal
@gopietz Reading the job descriptions (the titles comes from the government classifications) I'd say Software Developer is more of an Architect role.
Axel Norvell
Awesome site! I'd be interested in seeing a "leaderboard view" of all the jobs to quickly compare everything on one screen (instead of typing in each one).