Gört is a versatile organizer, integrating map functionality with traditional to-do list features. Perfect for both daily tasks and complex projects with a new intuitive and powerful modular attachment design. A new take on what a to-do list should be.
Hello everyone!
One thing I’ve always missed with to-do list apps is the ability to put tasks on a map, just like placing pins in Google Maps. This feature would be perfect for planning trips, making a list of restaurants to try, or saving your favorite hikes. Gört solves this problem by allowing you to add locations as attachments, the same way you can add a PDF or a link to a website.
To integrate the map functionality seamlessly, tasks can be viewed based on attachment type. For example, all prioritized tasks can be viewed together in a sorted list, all scheduled tasks can be viewed on a timeline, and all tasks with locations can be viewed together on a map. This unique modular design not only makes Gört a perfect tool for traveling, but also makes it easier to find things in daily use.
It also provides a few other unique features:
- Mark tasks as ongoing, ignored, or completed.
- Star mark to highlight tasks in yellow.
- Set a priority on a scale from one to ten.
- Share lists by scanning a QR code (or via email).
- A structured and clean user interface.
The goal is to make it easy to structure tasks and information the way you want. This is the reason for the modular attachment system in combination with a recursive task structure. It’s about getting started easily with simple things like a grocery list while also being capable of handling ambitious projects without getting overwhelmed.
I hope you like it and would love to hear your thoughts!
Congrats on launching Gört! 🗺️ Integrating map functionality with to-do lists is a brilliant way to organize tasks and projects. How does the modular attachment design enhance user experience? Excited to see how Gört transforms productivity! 🚀
@kehui_guo thank you! The original idea behind the design was to be able to view all locations together on a map, but I believe this alone could have become kind of a gimmick. But when summarizing all attachment types and not just locations, it "fits" better into a generalized system. I also think it makes sense to have for example dates on a timeline, and that it in general makes things easier to find. If you're looking for a photo for example, you can go to the view with all photos, rather than look for the task with the photo attached. From a development perspective, it also makes it easier to add new features in the future.
I find the project very successful. I like it, and it offers many possibilities for organizing daily life. I believe it is a direct alternative to Things 3 and simultaneously provides several functions, such as the card feature. For me personally, most of the tasks or functions are not relevant to my daily life. Nevertheless, I would clearly prefer Tings. Why? You only pay for it once. With Gört, however, you have to sign up for a subscription. I don't understand at all why you have to sign up for a subscription for a function or application that doesn't incur recurring costs like servers or the like. I Things 3 it's completely unreasonable to offer it as a subscription model. I also wonder who is willing to spend money on it. It’s preferable to make a one-time payment.
You can test the full version of Things 14 days for free, don't need to buy.
https://culturedcode.com/things/
Compare pricing:
Things 3
iOS: USD 9,99
iPadOS: USD 19,99
macOS: USD 49,99
Total: USD 79,97 (one-time payment if you need it for all platforms)
Gört USD 49,99/ year Makes in 3 years USD 149,97
Think about.
Gört
Just Scroll
Gört
Bookmer
Bookmer