I have been using Wordplay often over the last few months. The UI is easy to grasp and use, and best of all the generated text is fairly good, with only minor revisions needed in general.
Well done to @curran_van_waarde1 and the team!
I’ve tried a lot of AI content writer tools, and have refunded most (if not all) except for Wordplay. I am so impressed With the fact that the output is truly optimized for SEO, with the goal of ranking your content in mind. The quality of output is great, and sounds like a human wrote it (as opposed to a robot.)
Other tools claim to provide long form blog output. But there’s a lot of steps involved to get to a good output, and even then you have to edit the content. With Wordplay, it literally is just one click of a button. This saves me so much time.
If you’re looking for a solution that will give you high quality output, for very little effort, this is the one.
I've used Wordplay to help create a starting point on several articles this past month which has saved me lots of time. While you definitely have to go through and make some edits and add your own personal voice, I'm always surprised at the quality of content that it generates. I'm looking forward to seeing how it affects my SEO efforts in the long run, but I'm happy thus far.
I’ve used dozens of writing tools A.I. and otherwise and Wordplay is by far one of the best long form tools on the market. Being a relatively new comer to the space they’ve shown great promise with respect to quality output and user-centric product development.
If you haven’t already give them a try you might just stay for awhile — I did.
PS: Wordplayers, I would love to see the design of the platform rise to the quality of the software. Not the worst but I say it because I love this tool.
I tried many AI content SaaS. There's is not comparison with WordPlay. They quality of the output is absolutely amazing!
It still requires work and development, but so far it's already top-notch
This makes the best sentences. But it won't process pieces with Daniel Radcliffe in the title and errors range from dangerous to hilarious and may be harder to catch. They are so prevalent that fact checking will take longer than writing it. (Much more than the 5 minutes they say to have your virtual assistant spend in the how-to video.).
One piece i requested was what we should know about Monkeypox. It reads like English, but was entirely wrong, like a Jim Carey character or the worst case of someone believing they can bullshit their way through a topic they know nothing about.
Every single sentence was wrong in the "How do you catch Monkeypox," section (other than ""If you were bitten by an arthropod that was not infected with the virus, then you most likely will not contract this illness.") Not only is it silly, arthropods are not of concern.
Tons of info exists online on this topic. The trusted sources are obvious and clear answers exist.
Not only are monkeys (and arthropods) not of any worry, it's scary that this product shakes a random association shaker or something and determines that you should stop " feeding your pets monkey food like bananas and grapes as they could contain harmful viruses in them too."
Impressive sentences and speed. Be careful.
Potentially dangerous to one's reputation, readers and rankings. The fact that is sets you up for good SEO could prove again that good marketing killing bad products faster.
The evaluating mechanism isn't right either. The monkey pox generated words went on:
"Should you be worried about catching this disease?
First, people should not be alarmed by the news of this virus. It is not a true pandemic or epidemic. This is not another HIV or Ebola and it is not contagious to humans in any way. Second, there are no confirmed cases of Monkeypox in gay Americans as of yet. But this is only because mainstream media has been exaggerating the information about this disease so much that people have been scared into thinking they have already caught it. Third, if you are concerned about having contracted Monkeypox, don’t be. "
{Generated content. Again NONE of this info is correct}
Also why won't it process posts about Daniel Radcliffe?
I've been pleasantly surprised by the long-form content WordPlay produces. It's a great addition to my ai writing arsenal. Good luck with the PH launch.
I have been using Wordplay.ai for a couple of months and I am never disappointed by the quality of the articles generated by the AI.
The articles are over 1K words, they are always on subject and always plagiarized free. I'd go as far as saying you would not be able to tell they were not generated by a human.
For me, the best part about using Wordplay.ai to generate blog articles is it does it in just a few seconds. It used to take me around two weeks to research and write 10 blog posts but now, once I have the topics researched in an hour or so, I can put those topics into Wordplay.ai and it will churn out perfectly optimized articles in less that 5 minutes.
After trying several AI content creators, I started using Wordplay a few months ago, and am very happy with it.
Worplay is the clear winner in the Long-Form AI write niche, and the one I use and recommend!
It just received a well-deserved upvote here on Product Hunt.
Usually one click AI writers are junk but Wordplay has something going for it. Hope it progresses into something even more powerful. Congrats on the launch!
growth.email