@titusdecali Thank you very much. I'm happy you enjoyed it. More will be added to give you more insights. What would you like to see in the results?

@titusdecali Would you like something that could tell you how to manage some traits?

@jc_prattdelzenne Well, for the time it takes to complete the test (compared to something like the Myers-Briggs test) the results are a bit lacking in depth.

@geeyam Yeah... wasn't my intention. You can use a fake email, you'll get redirected automatically to your results.

@geeyam I actually liked having to input my email address since the test results can now be easily accessed in the future and shared with my friends and family if I want to. I don't like being spammed and I don't like my email being collected unnecessarily, but as long as it is used responsibly by @jc_prattdelzenne I don't mind :)

@geeyam @jc_prattdelzenne You didn't expect to get the results for free ... did you? Emails are assets. For the purpose of just testing, just enter fake email as the Maker suggested --- Feedback: - Avoid red buttons on the left choices - Nice UI - 10 minutes to take the test is ridiculously long ( Lower this amount to collect more emails) If I owned this: I know this personality test is all "mambo jambo" fairy tale, but i want to collect as many emails as I can. I would make the test shorter, Verify the email address to get the report, even ask for phone number to send the report to your phone... On the backend, I would either sell my own products to other people's products by sending 4-5 follow up emails that actually help people improve the "negative" parts about their personality. Good luck!

@satishgaire “Free” is literally the 3rd word on the page "Scientifically validated free..." I know emails are not exactly free, and my feedback is; it's better to be upfront. It is the difference between leaving the page with "Oh great idea and looks nice, but I don't want to give my email now" vs leaving the page after 15 mins "Grrr, it's one of these dark patterns". Otherwise, I don't have any problem people asking for email, phone number, or money — as long as it's upfront. Mine is just a feedback, it’s up to the maker what to do with it. No bad intentions. It’s a common strategy, so it must be working for people.

@geeyam I understand your point, but you know this... Nothing is "Free". "Free" usually means there is no monetary exchange.

@jc_prattdelzenne Hi JC, congrats with your launch. Can you tell some more what you'll be doing with the data you're collecting (including personal data)? I can't find any explanation why you need my mail address for instance.

@evertsemeijn Thank you very much. The only use I have for email addresses is to send the result so users can keep it, it's more convenient, I have no other use for it. I don't have any promotion purpose with it.

@jc_prattdelzenne I understand. You might want to make that clear on the site. It keeps me from handing you over mine. And for how long are you storing the result pages?

@evertsemeijn You are right, I should have made that more explicit. For now, I didn't think of an expiration date, but it can be done. Like a link to delete the content in the email I send to the user.

@jc_prattdelzenne @evertsemeijn Glad you asked about what data's being collected – seeing Cambridge Analytica mentioned as a 'usage example' set off a few alarm bells for me 😅

@kgbot111 I'm really sorry I gonna check that now.

@kgbot111 Can you retry? it should work now. Sorry for the issue.

@jc_prattdelzenne Works like a charm now, and it's awesome, 99% correct results. If you need any other testing or early users feel free to contact me about new features, or anything I can help you with.

@jc_prattdelzenne p.s. Great thing is that answers are saved in local storage so I don't have to take test again if accidentally closing tab or something does not work, great job.

@kgbot111 Great ! I will definitely need some, thank you very much for your support ! 😀

@namtran_wd Hi David, Thank you very much! I hope it will be useful I should have signaled on my website what I would not do with people's data. I wanted to launch to learn. I will not do anything with it...

@ayoub_aabass1 Thank you very much for you feedback :-)

@sapvdfluit Thank you very much Stefan ! I’m very happy it’s helping you ! If you want to, you can donate here : https://bit.ly/2UZmunR. It could be great if you have 30-45min to make a Zoom/Meet Call to understand how you use Persona, it could help us make it better and even more useful to you :)

@sapvdfluit @jc_prattdelzenne for sure! Want to find a time in my calendar? https://calendly.com/sapvdf

@lajlev It's a great idea, what would you like to show on your CV? a summary or get the full data?

@lajlev Nice ! I'll show you in the following days how we could find ways we could use to get your data automatically to your website 😊

@darktowers I'm really confused... just tried and it works. Can you tell me what is your browser?

@jc_prattdelzenne Chrome. Loads of other people in this thread experiencing the same issue so it doesn't look like an isolated case. Good luck troubleshooting.

@michael_a1 There's a lot that could be said. It's a scale so yeah if you are in the middle you will feel like you are both. Openness/Intellect is a stance, often used in Academics it's very progressive. Tradition is the opposite stance, it's very conservative. In the work of Dr. Colin DeYoung and Dr. Jordan B. Peterson "Sources of Openness/Intellect: Cognitive and Neuropsychological Correlates of the Fifth Factor of Personality" they describe Low Openness as Traditionnal(Most traditionnal with high Conscientiousness) and High Openness associated with Intellect. (Not only intellect, you have many other facets) Intellect is not IQ it's different, it's a stance, but there's a correlation between the 2.

@michael_a1 If you need more, there's an accessible wiki that summaries all this : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In...

@jc_prattdelzenne Thanks. I still find it conflates two very different attributes. 1) Openness to Experience (reflecting cognitive engagement with perception, fantasy, aesthetics, and emotions) and 2) Intellect (reflecting cognitive engagement with abstract and semantic information, primarily through reasoning). These are NOT the same thing. Thanks for the quick reply and engagement. And thank you for the wonderful test. But I do suggest better terminology for this scale.

@the_health_buzz MBTI is more like astrology than a scientific personality test. It’s not recognized by scientific Psychology researchers. It is very famous because like astrology or anything people can be interpreted in any way we want. Big five Personality is the most recognized and accurate of all personality tests, it’s no nonsense focused, backed by empirical research and is taught in Psychology courses at Universities.

@erikjrichter Can you retry? It should work this time.

@adigadiko I'm really sorry I gonna check that now.

@adigadiko Can you retry, I should work this time.

@luikohl It uses React with Nextjs. :-)

@jonaaust It's the Big Five test. But the personality items come from the IPIP community. I made this to make it more popular, it's known in some circles that make some research but not from the public. Furthermore, I want to make other tests more known, like the Dark Triad, Addiction Tests, Self Delusional tendencies and more. The concept of "Free Traits" by Brian R. Little can also be very useful for people, but before that I start small, with the Big Five :-)

@gamblers_united I'm really happy it was useful for you. :-)

@stewart_alexander1 This is absolutely not ! It's a scientific test that is reliable and used by psychiatrists and clinical psychologists when they need assess personalities. You can search about the Big Five Personality Traits and the IPIP scientific community to learn more ;-)

@vjekoskarica I completely understand what you mean, that's one of the reasons I wanted this to exist in an attractable and easy to use design. For now, it's "basic". I want to use Dr Robert Sapolsky Models (Stress, the Aging Brain, and the Mechanisms of Neuron Death, Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers) To help people understand Stress and the Neuroticism trait that's existent in the Myers-Briggs. Also show the Free Traits Model of Dr Brian R. Little(Me, Myself and Us) and more. People don't need fake things...

@jc_prattdelzenne Nice! I like your approach! Hope to see you launch more stuff as soon as possible :)

@vjekoskarica Thank you very much for your support ! 🙂