Good luck!
I think people forget that Product Hunt is not an overnight sensation it took a lot of time and effort to get here.
What people see as conspiracy and exclusion is just evolution of the platform and community that you see today.
@chrismessina@mubashariqbal Copying and pasting this from their About page (https://www.openhunt.co/differences).
> Differences between Open Hunt and Product Hunt
- Open and Transparent
- Get Feedback on your product
- Audit Trail
- Community Governance
- Karma System (proposed)
- Queuing System (proposed)
In short, I think the goal is to borrow some elements that have worked on Reddit, make the code open source, and let the community drive the product roadmap directly.
Gatekeepers ha ha. If you have a great product, it will be on PH. The community here is awesome, but like any community you need to engage with it.. Product Hunt is a curated list of the best products available. A list of everything just isn't helpful...
@danielkempe I concur. One improvement for this type of open submission could be adding categories/collections/tagging so that everything's not in one big bucket.
@danielkempe I disagree, PH is littered with Wordpress themes, incremental updates to old stuf and other assorted not-product stuff like movies, shows and so on...one must stretch his imagination to call it all product
@danielkempe completely disagree (with all due respect). There is an insider aspect to PH that is known and documented. Aside from "great" being a subjective term, a product will usually only make the PH top list if submitted by a curator/insider/gatekeeper (whatever term you prefer). Products submitted to upcoming by the general community rarely make it to the top (great or not).
@callmeed@danielkempe Erik, I think that "known and documented" is an odd term to use for Product Hunt's curation process. It's been a while since I checked the FAQ, so I'm not sure if it's in there, but I've heard the process discussed in numerous podcasts and interviews of the team, so it's not like there's a skeleton in the closet.
That being said, I hear you on the "insider" aspect. The invitation process could easily lead to cronyism, or to power-pandering invites. However, I have been very impressed by Product Hunt's consistent attempts to give voice to underrepresented groups in the tech world. For example, early on, they reached out to me and gave me five invitations, asking that I please give them out to women who would become great members of the community. (Note: I'm not the best curator, I think only 2/5 are active. 😅 But that gave me a strong appreciation for how hard it is to do this sort of thing.)
I'm not saying I'm against greater openness, but I do have faith in the team to adjust over time. And if anyone needs a reminder of what happens when there isn't curation, one needs only to looks at the screaming/crying/weird sexual advances that occurred during the Kevin Jonas AMA. (most of which were extremely cute, but some bordered on creepy)
@kikischirr thanks for the reply. I was referring more to posts than users and invites ... my comment was in the context of @danielkempe's statement that "If you have a great product, it will be on PH"–it's simply not true in a curated environment where only a handful of people can post to the front page. Just like there are great iOS apps that may never get featured by Apple in the App Store, the same applies here.
Take a look at these two links if you haven't already:
https://medium.com/@benjiwheeler...http://recode.net/2015/06/18/pro...
Look, I really like PH and have found valuable products there. I also understand that "you can't please all the people all the time." But good things can go bad if growth isn't handled properly.
I'll admit I'm a little baffled, @jacquescrocker, as to where you see this heading. It's an awful lot of effort for a copycat product. What is your vision?
@kikischirr It's admittedly starting out as a bit of a copycat. However, remember the original Product Hunt HN post: "Hacker News for Products". So there's a slight bit of precedent there. We currently have some important differences (https://www.openhunt.co/differences) and I see Open Hunt further differentiating itself as it goes on.
The vision: a community targeted towards the very early stage product launches. Less curated, more community driven. Post the good stuff with the bad, and let the community work out which ones are the best (and the bad ones can ideally get some important feedback on how to improve).
Okay, let's go the other way.
If I understand you correctly and we are talking about the big picture, we would transform Product Hunt to Open Hunt by giving featured access to each user and comment access.
Now everyone who still thinks Open Hunt is a good idea: there are days when 100+ products are posted to PH, 10-20-30 get featured. The others may be good but Open Hunt is totally on the other side. How would a casual user glimpse on 100+ produts @jacquescrocker ?
Same with comment access. Don't you think some people who are more "enthusiastic" about their startups will just casually comment 400 times on each product to get some spotlight? Or even better: If a startup hires people to do it?
@noxowe these seem like solved problems in Reddit or HN. PH does not use karma which seems to be a key component of it's predecessors community. Obviously the discussions in HN and Reddit (and the 1000s of active sub-reddits) are very different from one another and I think OH has a chance to develop their own unique community. It could also end in a terrible ball of fire. I'll be excited to watch. And these are only problems if they have a bunch of active users, so I'm sure that is their first hurdle.
This is sooo interesting. Everyone from Product Hunt will definitely leave PH and use a version that PH had 6 months ago?
PS: It doesn't work like that.
@thestefanstokic that's not what we're expecting at all. I'll still use Product Hunt. Just now there's another option, one that's tailored for the earlier stage / experimental products. Think of it maybe as a site dedicated to only "Upcoming" items (if you are into that sort of thing).
@thestefanstokic I don't think it's targeting people who use Product Hunt. More likely the people who are feeling excluded from it. If you look at the HN thread, there are a lot ...
@tarr11 Yes, I realize that it doesn't target PH community - Because they won't want to leave because they like it. There are a select number of frustrated people on HN, so yeah, they are targeting a niche that don't like Product Hunt.
@thestefanstokic@tarr11 if someone built a product for everything the HN peeps got angry about, we'd need about another five PH clones to handle the volume. 😝
Open Hunt looks like a great opportunity for makers with early stage products to get feedback when they need it. The wisdom of keeping feedback private is questionable, but the community is young and will learn what provides its members the most value.
@kkdub I think hiding the feedback was a poor choice as well. But luckily it is open source and we can submit this as an issue! I bet it already has been.
@jsneedles@rrhoover and evidently mine can't be opened or voted upon bc it was posted after the other... also I provided feedback, did you get it? It said it'd go to the maker of the product.
@jacquescrocker - how does Ryan get my feedback?
It seems like you're trying to find an alternative to the Upcoming section of PH? I'm all for that, though, I'm not sure this is the right way of doing it. You should offer something more. A chance for products to stand out of this really large list. For example: every 15 minutes, 5 different products get to be in the spotlight. That way, product at the bottom of the list also get a chance to catch some upvotes.
@poehah I think there are some real opportunities to develop really great features. Keep in mind this is their initial launch. I'm excited that it is open source as well. I'm definitely going to try and contribute something.
I mean, part of the appeal of Product Hunt is that because it's curated, you don't have to wade through a billion submissions every day. This is like the 'new' section of reddit vs the 'hot' section of reddit.
@bryantpeng agreed! Open Hunt is meant as an alternative -- not a replacement. we hope it'll eventually carve out a place where it's useful to some people
@bryantpeng Except it's EXACTLY like the 'hot' section of Reddit - because it does rank by upvotes in addition to submission time.
Product Hunt, by contrast, is less like Reddit due to the restricted posting.
@bryantpeng product hunt's featured list is not like the hot section of Reddit. It is a special list hand selected by human moderators. The hot list on Reddit is just sorted by a scoring algorithm.
@dan_e_gray@patrickjbradley@bryantpeng Sorry for the confusion, I didn't mean the 'hot' section of reddit in terms of having the same mechanism. Talking about post quality, quantity, etc. Obviously we can go into semantics all day ("Reddit's quantity is infinite so this analogy isn't 100% accurate!") but you get the general idea.
The "problem" with PH is the *weight* people give it, A LOT OF WEIGHT. All those "Hyped bloggers" writing how PH drove signups and VC money is a double-edged sword for the product hunt marketing team.
The OMGWTFBBQness propagated through the interwebs at speed of light.
Yes, it's curated.
Yes, you might have the best startup ever and still not be featured.
Yes, there's a lot of secret-handshaking.
A lesson you need to learn ^
*You don't have to be featured on PH to become a billion dollar company*
<3 them or hate them! Why can't we just all hunt & chill? 👍
What say this one be about featuring the feature-worthy - rather than featuring everything, carte-blanche, based on cronyism and inheritance - who the decision-makers at PH is a "somebody" elsewhere? Wouldn't that be refreshing?
Actually, I already see this as radically different from PH. PH is curation over competition, while OH is the exact opposite. I predict two implications of that:
1. It won't feels as prestigious to be featured there
2. if successful, there will be tons of products, so it probably will be more common to access pages through direct link (thus, the only value will be comments, for those posts, got to add that quick) and the competition will be among those at top of the list.
But actually, what I'm the most concerned about for the life of this product is how it has been well received by PH haters. The announcement was a huge success on HN. @jacquescrocker once you've made comments public, how do you plan to prevent hate and unmoderated bashing in those comments? Or maybe you don't especially want founders to join the discussions?
@oelmekki I know they are considering a karma system. I think the comment section of HN is pretty good and they don't require any special privilege to comment or submit.
@itsnblackburn I actually think PH has lost something for me in their recent updates. The main list is no longer the first thing I see when I open the app. I find myself opening the app less now. 😖 I am also planning on contributing to OH. Looks like it could be fun.
@chrismessina they're not public. How they get to the makers, 0 idea. How do they know who the makers are, 0 idea. For something so open, there are a lot of questions remaining.
@jacquescrocker, a VERY IMPRESSIVE first effort. Keep your head in the right place and it will succeed. We need it to.
Hey @chrismessina why so much effort in trying to ridicule an impressive first effort? You're surely bigger than that man.
And to the people wondering why it doesn't have the same features a multi-million dollar funded alternative, ProductHunt started as a spreadsheet. That was before it became a place for "special people" to wield power.
What i'm certain is that this will prosper and at worst will make @ryanhoover seat up.
At best...
@oothenigerian I'm not ridiculing anything. I support the idea of taking an idea, forking it, trying to make it better... I get that there's probably some desire for "more transparency" (which is relative, of course). I'm more interested in understanding the core motivations here, and what injustices are trying to be corrected by making the project open source.
Just because something is open source doesn't mean it's better, or that its governance will be less prone to cronyism, insiderism, or corruption. It just means that the source code is available for anyone to look at, and depending on the license, to be forked, contributed to, or built anew in another instance.
@chrismessina@oothenigerian I think you are mixing things up here. It's open not because its source code is available but because of the whole system is transparent and open. Here is FAQ you may want to read it: https://www.openhunt.co/faq
I love that the PH folks are embracing and upvoting this project. It shows real commitment to the idea behind it all and I am very interested to see if there is room for both and how it pans out over time. In either case, good job to @jacquescrocker & @rrhoover & PH in general.