Othmane N.

How do you validate an AI-integrated SaaS idea before building too much?

I recently started working on an AI-SaaS product, and like many of us here, I wanted to avoid building something no one really wants.

So here’s the process I followed (and still refining) — curious how you do it too:

1. Start with a painful workflow

Instead of brainstorming a “cool AI use case,” I picked a workflow I personally hate doing manually or one that takes hours to complete.

2. Mock the solution before building it

Before writing a single line of backend code, I mocked the whole experience:

  • Landing page with clear problem/solution.

  • Fake UI using Figma or Webflow. Recorded a demo as if the product exists.

Then shared it on LinkedIn, indie hacker groups, and a couple of Reddit subs. This gave me:

✅ Early interest

✅ Skepticism (which helped a lot)

✅ The exact objections I need to solve

3. Let users try to pay

The biggest validation for me wasn’t signups, it was:

Are users asking for a trial* or trying to subscribe even when there’s friction?

* Are they frustrated there's no live version yet?

I offered no free plan, just a simple pricing table — and I got people to ask "where can I try this?"

4. Track one key thing: urgency

If people say “this looks interesting” but don’t take any action → it’s a sign to go deeper into the problem.

But if even 10 people express urgency, ask about launch dates, or DM for access → you’re onto something.

5. Don’t overbuild the AI part yet

I use GPT, Claude, etc., but kept the AI layer very shallow in the MVP.

Why? Because:

  • Most users don’t care how* it works.

  • They care if it saves them time or money.

  • Build the wrapper, test the UX, then scale the AI logic.

Curious to hear from you 👇

If you’ve validated an AI-SaaS, or in the middle of it — what worked for you? What signals did you look for?

Let’s swap notes

26 views

Add a comment

Replies

Best
Igor Lysenko

This is a good approach. Nobody wants to buy something they don’t need. And if there is a workflow automation that can help, it will be valued even more

Priyanka Gosai

This is one of the most grounded frameworks I’ve seen laid out especially the emphasis on urgency over surface-level interest.

In my experience, the biggest green flag has been manual workarounds. If potential users are already hacking together solutions (Excel + Zapier + ChatGPT, etc.), and they're still frustrated that’s signal. And when they start describing their own ideal version of the solution before you even pitch yours, that’s your cue to move.

On AI completely agree with you. We’ve learned the hard way that users don’t buy “AI” they buy clarity, speed, and peace of mind. If you can get one of those three right early, you can afford to keep the AI logic shallow until usage teaches you what to deepen.