Webflow vs. Framer Sites?

Good question I'm hoping to see some good comparisons too, I love Webflow but I always associate Framer with speed.

Webflow has more features than Framer, but Framer is more user-friendly. We are Top Rated Financial Advisors.

Having spent a hundred hours on both so far (40 on webflow, 60 on framer) and starting from zero (absolutely no css html knowledge beforehand, watching tons of tutorial videos for both) - here's my take. Like what others said webflow seems powerful with lots of features, the learning curve is steep. Framer's learning curve is more friendly to me. Not by a lot due to having to understand the concepts of positioning and sizing for the different breakpoints (absolute vs relative, stacks vs frames) but the tipping point for me was that the interactive elements (i.e so your website looks like its from 2022 and not 2010) are super easy to build and manipulate once you set things up properly. Framer 'feels' more Figma-ish? I think it will get there eventually. There's lots of minor bugs still but nothing major. Just remember to refresh your browser if something seems amiss. ps. I think webflow is a great product, it just wasn't for me - and the market is probably big enough that its good to have more options :)

Framer has some performance problems for complex websites because it uses React for rendering animations, after they improve performance (maybe with react server components) Framer will be a no brainer for me, much easier to use compared to WebFlow

Me and @imanmoaz are considering some alternatives to Webflow. Of course, Webflow is powerful, but it's not the fastest process to learn on how to add new features. It's time consuming. So, Ian, what you mention here about Framer is interesting, we need to check it out.

I've tried both. Webflow and framer and hundreds other builders. However, I didn't like all of them and decided to create my own. It's called https://airtap.io. Framer-looking, but more unique with ready-to-use sections (blocks) and a fast editor. Templates are fully customizable, and every step in the design process involves adding blocks section by section. Compared to others, it is much more convenient. Additionally, we have marketing tools like CRM and a community with social profiles. I'm sure you will love it.

Webflow

Framer experience is almost the same as Canva for me. I switched adobe premier pro to canva video for a week. Then i found that i like working on premier more because it has more features and is hard to work around :D Canva video is too user-friendly. I like playing around with CSS, so Webflow is a better choice.

Webflow for marketing websites anyday. Easy to use, update and replicate.

Webflow has more features than Framer.. i like webflow

You're spot on with this topic being timely and quite relevant! As a matter of fact, we at @glorify_app had to grapple with this very question recently. We decided to make the switch from Webflow to Framer, mostly because we were highly impressed by the efficient journey from design to publication that Framer offers. It simply meshes very well with our work dynamics. Our CEO, @buildwithomar dug deep into this exact subject in a video he shared on his channel not too long ago. In it, he weighs up the pros and cons of both platforms, provides an account of our reasons for transitioning, and shares valuable insights that could benefit others who are contemplating a similar move. You can watch it here: youtube.com/watch?v=m9Ne7-xmcHI At the end of the day, both Webflow and Framer have their unique strengths, and there's definitely a place for both in the tech sphere. However, the best fit for you will depend on your specific needs, workflows, and objectives. In our case, we felt that Framer's focus on design better suited our current requirements. That being said, we can't overlook the powerful capabilities and extensive features that Webflow brings to the table. Navigating through these platforms is an intriguing journey, and we're always excited to hear about others' experiences and perspectives.

Absolutely! Here's a short and straightforward comment: "As a Webflow user, I'm amazed at its no-code capabilities for creating websites. However, I recently discovered Framer Sites and was blown away by its speed and code control. It's gaining traction with impressive projects. Choosing between the two depends on your preference for simplicity or customization. Consider your budget, coding skills, required features, and scalability. To know more about it go through this article https://digitalsushma.com/framer.... Happy designing!"

Webflow is ideal for those who need advanced design flexibility with a visual, no-code editor that feels close to coding. Framer Sites is best for quick prototyping and simple site designs, but it has limitations and is too complex. You may use: Wix also