I worked for 13+ years as an employee but I always worked on side projects.
2 years ago I jumped to 100% founder.
I made the jump because I felt I was paid just a fraction of the actual value I was producing.
What about you?
Running a company is in fact a hard thing to do. I started Menlo Park Patents and several other tech. companies. In the beginning we were only receiving about 3-5 clients per month which is challenging from a financial perspective. Now we are at the point where we sign 1 new client per day that has a new invention. I can say that in the beginning it is very hard. Challenges will come through out the lifetime of the company but it is WAY more rewarding than being a employee.
@alessio_mavica I don't know. Having a stupid boss requiring stupid things is, in fact, very stressful. Before going independent, I used to work for large corporations, and their hiring processes rarely identified stupid bosses
Of course, being a founder is really great. But not everyone can do it and it's not always possible. Sometimes it's good to be an employee temporarily, to learn teamworking skills and pick up new things.
Million dollar question, Alessio. I actually think for most employees (especially based in US) you can make more money as an employee vs. founder. Of course, there are wild exits etc. but overall being a founder is a scrappy existence for many many years. My friends still make $300k + at FANGS and that's hard to match as a founder...
It's contextual, I guess. If you are someone just entering the professional realm, getting in as an employee is better to learn things first. But if you have enough experience and a good idea with great potential then maybe you can explore the opportunity. It's always the high risk high reward concept with being a founder. Things can always go south.
WizardIP