Zing shows promise in its concept, aiming to support users in their pursuit of fitness goals. However, the app's execution falls short, failing to deliver value commensurate with its steep price.
One of the most basic yet crucial features missing from the app is a buzzer or sound notification to alert users when their rest timer is up. This absence can easily disrupt workout flow and hinder progress tracking, as users may lose track of their rest periods.
The app's inability to allow users to input essential workout data such as reps, sets, and weight achieved is another significant drawback. Tracking and monitoring progress is crucial for assessing performance and making informed adjustments to fitness routines, and this app fails to provide that functionality.
Users with specific exercise equipment may also find themselves at a loss, as the app's limited exercise library may not include their options. This oversight renders their investments in such equipment useless. A truly effective fitness app should offer a wide range of exercises and the flexibility for users to swap exercises based on their abilities and preferences. For example, not everyone can perform a single leg Romanian deadlift, and the app should suggest appropriate alternatives.
The app's exercise recommendations are also problematic, with the same exercise sometimes suggested for three days in a row. This approach can lead to overuse injuries and hinder progress. A well-designed fitness app should prioritize variety and recovery to ensure users' safety and long-term success.
Another frustrating aspect of the app is its behavior when users navigate away during a rest period. It is common for people to check social media or read blogs while resting between sets, but this app pauses the timer when the user switches to another app. This disruption breaks the flow of the workout and adds unnecessary frustration to the user experience.
In summary, while the app's concept holds potential, its execution is severely lacking. The absence of critical features, restricted exercise options, potentially harmful recommendations, and disruptive user experience make it challenging to justify the high cost. To provide genuine value to users, the developers must address these issues and incorporate user feedback. In its current state, users may be better served by exploring alternative fitness apps that offer a more comprehensive, user-friendly, and thoughtfully designed approach to supporting their fitness journey.
