e d'ensemble
Avis
Ă€ propos
CoinGecko
Avis 144 • Bas
TrustScore 2 sur 5
1,9
coing
ecko.com
Activités de l'entreprise
Tout afficher
Profil non revendiqué
Aucune trace de demande d’avis
Les clients laissent des avis de leur propre initiative
Avis
1,9
Total : 144
5 Ă©toiles
13 %
4 Ă©toiles
5 %
3 Ă©toiles
1 %
2 Ă©toiles
1 %
1 Ă©toile
80 %
Devselyba
5 avis
Noté 1 sur 5 étoiles
Il y a 20 minutes
Coingecko must uphold principles of impartiality and equitability in their evaluation of projects,
The platform exhibits an excessive degree of centralization coupled with glaring favoritism. They assert an unearned authority in distinguishing the virtuous from the questionable within the crypto industry. Furthermore, their listing policies are replete with inconsistencies; they profess adherence to criteria that demand a project to have a commendable social engagement via exchange listings. Yet, it has come to our attention that certain projects presently featured on this platform display negligible trading activity, lack exchange listings, and possess feeble social media engagement.
Coingecko must uphold principles of impartiality and equitability in their evaluation of projects, adhering to uniform criteria applied judiciously across the spectrum of crypto projects, including those already present in their listings.
All cryptocurrency projects should be treated equitably, devoid of prejudice. The platform should refrain from assuming an authoritative role in determining what is deemed positive or negative. Instances of inaccuracies have been observed, wherein projects with questionable intent, such as Celsius, Luna, or FTX, have been included due to a lack of discernment.
Cryptocurrency epitomizes a paradigm shift, marking a profound evolution towards a more just and unbiased society. At its essence, it introduces an innovative means to equalize opportunities and redefine the very principles of fairness.
Coingecko's lack of impartiality and evident favoritism is a cause for concern. To rectify this issue, there is an urgent need to establish transparent evaluation processes that prioritize fairness and equality for all cryptocurrency projects. It's imperative to foster an environment where every project, regardless of size or influence, is given an equal opportunity to thrive and be accurately represented in the crypto landscape.
