Subscribe
Sign in
Launched on April 3rd, 2025
Launched on March 26th, 2025
I really like Claude, and I use it nearly daily. I feel like I'm probably missing out on taking full advantage of it though, because I've never used Projects.
Any tips for using it effectively? Is it better to keep the Projects very niche? Or does it work alright with general/ongoing work?
It's a hybrid reasoning model, producing near-instant responses or extended, step-by-step thinking. One model, two ways to think. We’re also releasing an agentic coding tool: Claude Code.
Claude can now search the web. Each response includes inline citations, so you can also verify the sources.
What I love most is how it gets the context right almost every time. Whether I'm asking for help with code debugging, content ideas, or analyzing some data, it keeps track of our conversation and gives relevant answers. It feels less robotic and more like having a really smart conversation partner.
Probably it's not appropriate for the simple use case I tested on. Asked: what are the 10 sub niches that can be used for a brand new blog, with no subscribers and no social media yet (of course, it's brand new), that can generate revenue and profit within 60 days. The answer was extremely simple: only listed 5 high level overused topics (niches) like health, finances, crypto, which is literally impossible to make a cent in 60 days. Instead any other (Grok, Gemini, Perplexity) provided right off the bat interesting subtopics (not necessarily is guaranteed will make money within 60 days, but at least they eliminated the overused/overcrowded from the get go.
Since they launched in EU it has been my default LLM. Especular for coding I fins the results better than ChatGPT.
Claude is seriously impressive – it feels like chatting with a thoughtful, well-read friend who’s also a genius coder. It handles long documents like a champ (think 200K+ tokens), gives nuanced answers, and doesn’t just summarize – it actually understands. I’ve used it for writing, editing, research, and even debugging code, and it rarely misses. What I really love is how calm and conversational it feels – less robotic, more human. Sometimes it can get a bit wordy, but I’d rather have that than dry, one-liner replies. If you care about clarity, reasoning, and a solid mix of creativity and logic, Claude is easily one of the best out there.
