Would you rather choose: Simplicity or Customization?
Alisha Widianti
36 replies
When it comes to productivity tools, do you prefer tools that are highly customizable, or do you value simplicity more?
Sound off in this discussion below! I would love to hear more of your thoughts 🥳
Replies
Hrithik Kaul@hrithik_kaul1
I'm in the same situation for my product.
I think how I'm going to go ahead is that the core roduct would be extremely simple, however if you need customisation, you'll have to install add-on plugins.
Share
Klever Suite
@hrithik_kaul1 That's a tricky part because we all know how add-on plugins, at least for the software products, usually come at an additional cost 🥲
YOYA AI
Great question! Personally, I believe that a balance between simplicity and customization is key when it comes to productivity tools. While highly customizable tools can offer a lot of flexibility, they can also be overwhelming and time-consuming to set up. On the other hand, overly simplistic tools may not have all the features and capabilities that I need to be productive.
NeatNook: Maintenance&Cleaning Schedule
Definitely depends on the product. Simplicity is good for one product, but for another, it will be a failure. It's the same with customization.
Great question, been stuck with it for a while now! However, what I've realized is that there are so many customization options out there that we should now aim for simple ones, particularly for productivity tools. Their main focus lies in making you feel more productive, right? But to achieve that, in my opinion, would be firstly by decluttering and easing up the processes. And by giving a user more options, it would have a reverse effect.
Klever Suite
Bababot
Customization
Now that's a great question! As someone who values both simplicity and customization, it can be a tough choice to make.
On one hand, simplicity can be incredibly important for productivity. Having a tool that is easy to navigate and understand can save time and reduce frustration. However, customization also has its merits. Being able to tailor the tool to fit your specific needs and workflow can greatly enhance productivity and efficiency.
But I think if I could only choose one, I would choose simplicity.
What's your choice @alishawidianti ?
Klever Suite
@gusoliveira_ Awesome points here! Thanks for sharing.
Regardless of what product we're building, I still think I'd choose simplicity - I want a tool that's easy to navigate with a nice, clean UX. I can gradually understand how it works from the beginning as I'm being onboarded. Tool adoption stress really gets to users in this day and age 😅
@alishawidianti perfectly stated!
Customization because it allows me to fix problems that the manufacturer has not addressed.
Simplicity for sure. Of course, I'd love to have some level of customization, but if the app meets my needs and requirements while being super simple, I'll be really happy
Comment Deleted
Tamly: Automate B2B Sales Outreach
I prioritize productivity tools that find a balance between customization and simplicity, guaranteeing efficiency without unnecessary complexity. This ensures that efficiency is achieved without introducing unwarranted complications into the workflow, which is crucial in running a successful business.
Supademo
Simplicity, anytime! I value products which are simple and yet high quality.
Depends upon the final user if you are viewing from the lens of the PM. Simplicity is always better for the masses. Customisation is the way to go for the power users of the product.
Klever Suite
@anjanay_saxena Excellent point! I like how you differentiated between the two depending on your users. We all know how important it is also to meet the needs of our power users 😄
Commented
It depends on the product's requirements. In some situations, simplicity is sufficient, but there are times when customization is necessary
Simplicity for me. For example even when we built Charge, we thought how can we not change anyone's behavior and make life easier for everyone.
Comment Deleted
Multi Find: Search, Highlight, Explore
I had to solve this dilemma with my own product, a highlighting extension. Although I was initially aiming to simplicity, each time I was adding a feature, the user interface got more and more complex. I ended up with a (too) highly customizable interface: after choosing the settings, the user can add or remove nearly any element of the interface, only keeping those one related to the parameters that are likely to change, depending on their habits.
My feeling is that making a simple interface (Ã la Apple) implies that you make choices on behalf of your customers. And you must be very clever to do the right choices and still satisfy the larger number of people.
But if like me, you are not brave enough or simply not experimented enough to do so with confidence, just let this choice to the end user.
And try to make the customization interface as simple as possible to come to a full circle!
ArtHeart.ai
Why can't we have both? I would say that the standard is simple but you can customize it to be as simple or complex as you'd like. If I had to choose one, it would depend on the product.
Prefer customization to have more fun and get the feeling of ownership.
i think it depends on the use case. If i have a a problem which is widely experienced (for example: CRM onboarding) then i think i would prefer a standardised, simple process. Whereas if my problem is unique to me/ or it changes frequently, then i need customisation (e.g. Notion)
Klever Suite
@leo_from_london Interesting point here!
I would prefer simplicity.