Is it better to be rich and famous or rich and unknown?
Business Marketing with Nika
20 replies
There are 2 types of people.
Those, who share their success without reluctance and everybody "need" to know how much they have đ€
or
Those, who rather do not talk about money. Even if they make big profits, they prefer to keep them a secret for peace of mind. đ€«
Which one are you?
Replies
Simonđ@simonas_kauzonas
Launching soon!
Rich and unknown wins - freedom + impact without drama.
Share
Lancepilot
Launching soon!
@simonas_kauzonas What are you launching by the way?
Lancepilot
Launching soon!
@simonas_kauzonas Makes sense!
Rich and unknown for sure.
Rich and unknown is best đđđ
i think that most people don't like attention - beign famous...but who knows.
App Finder
I prefer rich and unknown. But once you're doing something impactful with your money (and what's the point in being rich otherwise?), you'll become somewhat famous necessarily.
APIPark
Itâs often better to be rich and unknown, as privacy enables a more peaceful life without the challenges of constant public scrutiny.
Honestly, I donât like âflexâ type posts.
I get itâmany people are intrigued by the money youâre making. But personally, Iâm not a fan.
Two reasons:
1. Thereâs no real value in it. Youâre not actually helping anyone.
2. It creates security risks. If you have a lot of money and someoneâs looking for a target, youâre making yourself, your family, and your close ones vulnerableâfor just a few likes.
@busmark_w_nika
Itâs especially sad if youâre not actually making that money. Then youâd only be hurting yourself just because you wanted to show off. xD
Most people who flex on social media do make money. But itâs not the kind of money where youâd think, âWow, a real billionaire.â And if you want real protection for yourself and your family, you'll need to invest a lot to secure it. I donât think those showing off $5k-$15k per month can afford that level of protectionâand Iâd even say it probably hasnât crossed their minds.
In that sense, youâre creating a lot of potential headaches for yourself just to show off your Stripe screenshots.
Rich and unknown is better because you can literally control your life.
I prefer to be rich and not famous, it feels more comfortable and free from a lot of drama, I don't think it's important to show off the wealth we have.Just enjoy and share some with those in need, that's from my point of view, thank youâșïž
I prefer being rich and unknown. It offers the freedom to live authentically without the pressures of public scrutiny. True connections can flourish when youâre not in the spotlight. However, given my current age, I find myself wanting to pursue fame and attract more attention. I know that being unknown would lead to a calmer life, but deep down, I desire the recognition that comes with being famous.
Rich and unknown for sure. Fame comes with so many downsides - loss of privacy, constant scrutiny, people trying to take advantage. Being rich gives you the means to make an impact without all the drama and baggage that comes with celebrity. Just my 2 cents!
Rich and unknown for sure. Have all the freedom and opportunities wealth provides without the downsides of fame - no paparazzi, no privacy invasion, no public scrutiny of your every move. Can make an impact with philanthropy without all the drama.
Rich and unknown for sure. Fame is overrated - it just brings unnecessary attention and drama. With wealth and anonymity, you have the freedom and resources to make a real impact without all the noise. Plus, you can still live large without everyone knowing your business.
Fam is fleeting, wealth is enduring :)
Rich and unknown would be the best option
It's better to be rich and unknown and enjoy your life :)
