Do we need virality to build sustainable product?

No

Virality should come when you already have an MVP. The sustainable product will come with feedback from your target audience and, like everything, the more you have to choose from, the more data points you can gather, the better it will drive your growth.

A good product should create hype periodically and not take off like a rocket once and fall rapidly. Therefore, hype should be part of the product promotion strategy, not an accident.

I strongly believe storytelling is more important than virality for building a sustainable product.

I think there are several lines of defense that new products need to cross to remain sustainable. First one is accessibility. I think Clubhouse hurt its chances by starting out as an iOS exclusive app and by the Android release the hype slowed down. Outside factors didn't help either, as people started to get tired by the whole remote situation introduced by COVID. I think streaming platforms do an incredible job in this area. Second one is the network effect. Okay, I got Clubhouse, who else is there? It's like going to a library where you can read books written in a language you don't know. It's nice and all but it's of no use for you. I believe TikTok succeeded in this area by turning the flow upside down: it showed people content they'd share and consume with others who might not be connected to them in any way on the platform itself. Third one is value. The moment Threads opened its gates for the public, it was flooded with ads and brand generated content. Users who were otherwise curious about the new platform met with the same thing they can see everywhere on the internet: ads. It represents no value to users, therefore they let it go. Accessibility, network effect, value. I think at least 2 of these 3 factors need to be delivered to remain sustainable.

Virality can be a catalyst, but it's not the only path.

Comment Deleted

I think clubhouse was a product of the global political climate at the time. You oftentimes see some products spike after going viral but they actually end up in a better place than if they were to not go viral ie: Threads. I think TikTok is an example of an app that was aided by its virality. I think it depends on the product and the solution it solves. If there are other options in the marketplace that work better - of course users will lean into the best choice.

Look at SEO, no virality but sustainable!!

I think building sustainable product needs time and iteration

To build a sustainable business focus on generating revenue and profit.

I think in today's world, yes. The main thing is to use the hype correctly.

It is difficult to name a successful product that would not be on the hype. Therefore, I believe the hype is necessary for the profound success of the product.

Huh will people like sustainable virus? 😂

Virality can be a catalyst, but it's not the only path.

While virality can provide an initial boost, sustainable success depends on more than just short-term hype. Building a truly valuable and sustainable product involves focusing on user needs, delivering consistent value, adapting to feedback, and fostering a loyal user base. Virality can be a tool, but a well-rounded product strategy that addresses long-term needs and continuous improvement is essential for lasting success. What do you think?

To build a sustainable product, virality can be beneficial but it is not always essential.

Basically the things that make a product shareable aren't necessarily the same things that help a product's retention. Either one without the other won't work long term as you say!

Following

Nah. A sustainable product is one in which it costs less to run the product than it's making. For example, it costs $20/year for a website that you sell a $5 course on. Once you hit that 4th sale, it's a sustainable product. A lot of viral products, especially in tech, BLOW through money. Like, food delivery apps were hemorrhaging money, drivers were barely paid above minimum wage, and users were paying high prices. That is not a sustainable product. Where's the money going you may ask? Lawsuits and investors... Investing is great if it's done correctly, with proper funding and not with venture capital with ridiculous interest rates. Unfortunately, sustainable growth doesn't bring 2000x profit, so that's why you see the crash and burn. They flew too close to the sun.