About
🚀 Founder of action.it | Cloud & AI Solutions Architect I'm a seasoned cloud engineer and AI specialist! With over a decade of experience, I've become passionate about automating infrastructure and optimizing cloud operations. Along with expertise in AWS, automation, and machine learning, I've led large-scale deployments, streamlined workflows, and enhanced engineering efficiency. action.it automates meeting transcription, technical documentation, and real-time project analysis, keeping engineers focused. With integrations into popular meeting tools, it streamlines troubleshooting and architecture planning. My goal is to streamline all communications into a consolidated assistant any engineer, manager, director, or stakeholder can rely on.
Work
Engineering
Links
Badges
Forums
The Power of AI Summaries in Action 📝
Drowning in meeting notes? Our AI summaries are your lifeline.
Get concise, accurate summaries that capture decisions and action items automatically.
Get a glimpse of what's coming on June 27th. Upvote us to help us
make a splash
Does it matter if your app was purely "vibe coded" for acquisitions?
I've been having a lot of fun exploring AI and using tools like @Cursor, @bolt.new, @Lovable, and @Warp to learn how to build and make some apps for myself! I'm also noticing a tremendous amount of growth in folks creating their own apps using these same tools which has me wondering... if a company wanted to acquire someone's app or tool that was built via vibe coding, would it matter how it was built? Does the method of how it was built impact the valuation?
In my idealistic eyes, I'd like to think it doesn't. As an acquisition is often much more than just the tech but also the user base, brand, and even team behind the product. If anything I think that acquiring a product that has been "vibe coded" and putting them into capable engineering hands would only enhance the product...or a least make the code base cleaner.
I also believe that talent that is able to create stunning products with AI is currently a small percentage of folks, and that companies should be investing in acquiring that talent (either independently or via product acquisition) so that they can stay ahead in innovation while learning how to implement AI tools more efficiently in their orgs.
Very curious to hear what you all think!
AMA - how to craft a launch strategy that will break Product Hunt
Hi everyone! We're hosting the AMA LIVE on X (Twitter) and will be answering questions posted on the Forum during the Live.
Join the Live X session here: https://x.com/producthunt/status...
A while back we launched @Wordware and broke Product Hunt during our launch.
We're here to share bits of wisdom from our launch strategy, answer launch questions you may have, and even help point you in the right direction for the launch day!