About
Based in Jakarta, specializes in ensuring the security of blockchain networks and smart contracts. Focuses on identifying vulnerabilities and implementing robust cryptographic solutions.
Work
Data & Analytics at Marketing at Blockchain Security Analyst
Badges
Forums
Founders: What’s the biggest headache when applying to investors?
I work at an angel syndicate and see how clunky the fundraising process really is, founders spending hours on intake forms, re-typing bios, hunting down metrics, only to get ghosted.
I d love to hear your experience:
What s your current submission process?
What s the single most frustrating part?
If you ve got 5 mins, here s a super-short survey too:
Are you building features or killing features (i.e. simplifying your products)?
Just yesterday I prevented my team from adding an exotic feature to our product.
My hypothesis is that people don't like many features in a product as that complicates the product adoption e.g. many sales guys hate CRMs for this reason. In that sense, more features might equate to no features as users don't adopt/use the product. So, minimalistic products that solve 1 big problem (80% of the problem pie) is what people like.
That's what I think.
AI Hardware Design - should we bring back early 2000's design?
When it comes down to hardware my X feed is filled with two types of designs.
Retro/nostalgic 2000's hardware that was defined by Gameboy translucent purples, Colorful macs, Sony's beautiful eclectic electronics, and embracing colors that pop like pink, purple, and orange.
Sleek, modern, simple designs like the @Humane AI pin, @Limitless, @Friend, or the @omi.
I personally miss the fun days where consumer tech was wacky. Think Tamagotchi, Mini Clips, PSPs, and clear-shelled devices. I do see some like @Burner that have brought back some fun design but I'm curious... what does everyone think?
Should we bring back the weird or embrace the sleek, simple, and modern?