As the CEO of Liteflow, I’m committed to helping companies seamlessly enter the Web3 space, equipping them with all the essential tools and expert support they need to succeed.
Recently, we launched a startup program to help companies with funding and realized that many projects needed help with their tokenomics and relationships with investors/VCs.
We built this product to help our partners and clients, but also any startup in this position. Many startups are being sold advisory services that often don't bring much value, so our goal is to give the tools directly to projects and ultimately connect them with the right people.
If you're launching a Web3 startup and working on your tokenomics, feel free to share all the problems you are facing, and we'll find ways to help.
Cheers,
This is an intriguing solution that addresses a major pain point for Web3 startups. @antho1404, I'm curious about the benchmarking and scoring aspect of your platform. How do you ensure that the feedback shared from VCs is actionable and tailored for different types of projects? Also, can you elaborate on how the Tool for tokenomics design differentiates itself from existing solutions in the market?
It sounds like you're aiming to provide meaningful support instead of just advisory services, which is refreshing. What's the process for startups to access your services, and do you have any success stories from your recent startup program that could showcase the impact of your tools? 🚀
@elke_qin, thanks for the feedback. To address a few of your points:
Benchmark and score: This is an ongoing improvement system, we are collecting the tokenomics of 100s of projects, looking at their fundraising success, and seeing the impacts of vesting or airdrops on the price to issue a general indicator. This is obviously not a guarantee of success, but it is good to highlight possible issues. The goal is to scale to have thousands of projects for better analytics and "predictions."
Differentiation: This is a niche market with few products, and the "products" out there are mostly advisory services. We want to push self-serve solutions that don't rely on giving away tokens and taking risks with advisors. That said, projects will and should always have advisory services, but this tool aims to help them push the discussion with advisors to another level.
Process: Join the waitlist, and we will open the product over time to some of the projects who joined and those we are already discussing. We also use this to help with some projects we advise on my company, Liteflow.
@ondrej_halek Indeed, having a lot of quality feedback will be hard. Still, there is a way for their activity to get some information, such as the time they spend on each round, having a "point" system where they can give their sentiment on a specific section of the startup on their end to simplify the review process and on another end to help these projects with feedback.
We have been reviewing hundreds of Web3 companies, and when doing due diligence, we always take notes about the project. So, this is a place for you as an investor/VC to centralize your notes and, at the same time, share them to help these projects and show that you care as a VC.
MESG
Startup Death Clock
MESG
MESG