Snoop

@bentossell do it - bots are the hype today :). We're not using that many tools except for Browserstack and good ol' Chrome devtools :). Most of the checks are performed by humans (myself and @miene, our editor). Getting a feel of the website is important, so I prefer to actually dig in myself. Do you think $99 is too expensive for the report? I'm still in doubt about the pricing, but seeing as everything is human tested (& usually takes 3 hours) I think it's fair.

@poehah @miene haha I know but means I'd have to spend time trying out bots - time I do not have ;) I mean I get that it takes time and everything but I can imagine a lot of people being for and against that price. What I think you actually should think about is doing tiered pricing based on 1 website only and do it as $99, basic feedback, $199 comprehensive feedback and #299 for extensive deep dive feedback. (that is how I was going to do it) Could maybe add time constraints on the days too. so for $99 tier it may take a week, but $299 is within 24 hours. Essentially look at it in terms of the 80/20 rule. Where you want to provide most value, time etc should cost more IMO Then you may get the friction of asking 'why should I value your opinion' on their site - they can always go for the $99 option and 'upgrade'.

@bentossell makes sense! Might just change it up to that. Thanks :).

@philipkushmaro I agree the price point of $99 may seem a lot, especially when your main interest is finding out how well you do with SEO. Like you said, there are many free tools that help with that. However, via Snoop, you also get a professional editor looking at your content (and including a proofing sample). Usually, that alone costs more than $99. If you choose Snoop, it means you want to find out how your website is doing in multiple areas. Not just SEO. Hope that clarifies it a bit more :).