Are you adjusting for number of crimes committed against population density in cities - not sure how you calculate your score now but it seems like areas with no people = safe vs. areas where lots of people live = dangerous
Pros:
Nice Interface
Cons:
Basically the whole of NY is danger level of 9+ - you're almost saying there's nowhere safe to live in big cities.
@oleg_avrah Oh cool I get that the severity of the crime is weighted but are the volume of crimes committed also weighted against the population density? i.e. 10 crimes of similar severity committed in a 1 square mile region of a pop density of 1000 vs. the same crimes in an area of a pop density of 5000.
Hi Oleg, How do you get this data? I searched for my old place in Washington Heights in NYC and apparently is 9.3 in danger level when that's nowhere near of reality. For me this map is just showing where minorities/latinos live and labeling them as dangerous.
Planable
Fuego - What's Hot?
Are you adjusting for number of crimes committed against population density in cities - not sure how you calculate your score now but it seems like areas with no people = safe vs. areas where lots of people live = dangerous
Pros:Nice Interface
Cons:Basically the whole of NY is danger level of 9+ - you're almost saying there's nowhere safe to live in big cities.
Fuego - What's Hot?