GitQuest: Commit & Conquer

GitQuest: Commit & Conquer

Commit. Gain points. Conquer the leaderboard. Win prizes ๐Ÿ†

138 followers

GitQuest is the first game where developers compete to gain prizes! Each git contribution counts, try to get the highest score and win rewards ๐Ÿ†
GitQuest gallery image
GitQuest gallery image
GitQuest gallery image
GitQuest gallery image
Free
Launch tags:
Free Gamesโ€ขGitHubโ€ขDevelopment
Launch Team / Built With

What do you think? โ€ฆ

Alexandre Grisey
Hi friends! I'm excited to introduce you to GitQuest, the first git leaderboard for developers ๐Ÿš€ GitQuest is the first platform that turns your coding contributions into a game-like adventure where developers earn points, climb leaderboards, and win real prizes. ๐ŸŽฎ How It Works - Commit & Conquer: Every git activity counts! Make commits, create pull requests, and contribute to open-source projects to earn points - Climb the Leaderboard: Compete with developers worldwide and see your rank rise with each contribution - Win Rewards: Top performers can earn exciting prizes including: โ€ข ๐Ÿš€ Project visibility opportunities โ€ข ๐ŸŽ Exclusive discounts on developer tools and SaaS products โ€ข ๐Ÿ‘ Social media recognition โ€ข ๐Ÿ† Weekly and monthly competitions Ready to join the quest? ๐Ÿ˜‰
Nika
The idea is quite good. Something like Product Hunt for GitHub. I can see that in the future you will make a Hackathon. โš”๏ธ
Alexandre Grisey
@busmark_w_nika Thanks! That's a possibility, indeed!
Glenn Tรถws
That's nice! The idea of rewarding activity - especially in open source projects - is great. But I have two feedback points with potentially issues: - The idea suffers from the "platform" approach. You need a lot of people on your app to have a relevant leaderboard with significant rewards (Project visibility is great if the audience is big). That's not inherently bad, but it will be hard to reach that critical mass. - A leaderboard like this promotes "bad commits". Some people create mini PRs that don't have any benefit besides them now being a contributor and increasing their commit count. I think you could conter-act that by having an effective calculation on the count of "successful PRs", meaning merged PRs to projects that: - Are not owned by the users themselves - Have at least a small following (to avoid spam) Just my two cents. Overall a great idea, but with lot's of small things you may want to look at in order to make sure that gitquest really becomes a success. Wishing you all the best :)
Alexandre Grisey
@glenntoews Thanks for your comment and your feedback! I'am aware of these 2 issues, for the first one, yes of course it'll need a lot of users to be relevant (this is also why launches on PH and other platforms are important). It's slowly growing, but it is growing! For your second feedback, I'm aware of this, this is why I added a daily limit for each contribution, and I sort contributions by types to not allow everything.